Traducción de «tribunal no profesional » (Español → Inglés) :

(3) The general system Directives permit the host Member State to require, subject to certain conditions, the applicant to take compensation steps, notably where substantial differences exist between the theoretical and/or practical education and training undergone and that covered by the qualification required in the host Member State; under Articles 39 and 43 of the Treaty, as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Communities(6), the host Member State must assess whether professional experience is sufficient in order to prove possession of the knowledge which is lacking; in the interests of clarity and legal certainty f ...[+++]or individuals wishing to practise their profession in another Member State, it is desirable to incorporate into the general system Directives the requirement that the host Member State has to examine whether the professional experience gained by the applicant since obtaining his qualification(s) covers the subjects referred to above.

(21) The Court of Justice has consistently held that Protocol No 17 concerning Article 141 of the Treaty establishing the European Communities (1992) does not affect the right to join an occupational pension scheme and that the limitation of the effects in time of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-262/88 Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group does not apply to the right to join an occupational pension scheme. The Court has also ruled that the national rules relating to time-limits for bringing actions under national law may be relied on against workers who assert their right to join an occupational pension scheme, provided that they ar ...[+++]e not less favourable for that type of action than for similar actions of a domestic nature and that they do not render the exercise of rights conferred by Community law impossible in practice. The Court has also pointed out that the fact that a worker can claim retroactively to join an occupational pension scheme does not allow the worker to avoid paying the contributions relating to the period of membership concerned.

(14a) The Court of Justice has consistently held that the Barber Protocol does not affect the right to join an occupational pension scheme and that the limitation of the effects in time of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-262/88 Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group does not apply to the right to join an occupational pension scheme; the Court has also ruled that the national rules relating to time-limits for bringing actions under national law may be relied on against workers who assert their right to join an occupational pension scheme, provided that they are not less favourable for that type of action than for similar actions of a ...[+++] domestic nature and that they do not render the exercise of rights conferred by Community law impossible in practice; the Court has also pointed out that the fact that a worker can claim retroactively to join an occupational pension scheme does not allow the worker to avoid paying the contributions relating to the period of membership concerned.

We also know that the Court of Auditors has staffing problems; its staff, which must be highly qualified, do not stay in their posts very long – perhaps for reasons of personal promotion or professional career – and we should consider how we can resolve these problems, so that this staff is more stable and in order to facilitate the work of the Court.

In total, the Commission has issued three resolutions on competition amongst the liberal professions, the fundamental principles of which have been confirmed by the Court of Justice.

However, the quality of a body or an institution stands or falls with the people who bear the responsibility in it, which is why it is particularly important that candidates with the right specialist skills who are strong and independent of character be elected as members of the Court of Auditors.