Traducción de «Litigio internacional » (Español → Inglés) :

In particular, where the Union has requested an international dispute settlement body to indicate and authorise the measures which are appropriate for the implementation of the results of an international dispute settlement procedure, the Union commercial policy measures which may be needed in consequence of such authorisation shall be in accordance with the recommendation of such international dispute settlement body.

3.9 Even without progressing towards the second-generation models referred to above, the Commission should nonetheless, in order to meet expectations for this initiative and secure the benefits announced, at least have considered the possibility of including decision support systems in the platform's functions for the parties in an ODR system. In these second-generation models, the use of telematic tools and assistance from artificial intelligence based on mathematical models facilitate rulings on disputes through the systematic evaluation of the parties' proposals, in turn supported by IT specialists with equal capacity (‘intelligent interfaces’) in a interactive process based on standard negotiating patterns such as BATNA (Best Alternativ ...[+++]e to a Negotiated Agreement), WATNA (Worst Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) and finally ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement). Examples of decision support systems include expert systems, systems of information based on previous cases, computer database access systems (case-based reasoning or ‘CBR’ in international literature) and online dispute resolution based on the parties' different approaches to dispute resolution.

The rapporteur considers that, in so far as it is provided that each specific issue of an international dispute requires separate analysis, courts can avoid all potentially applicable statuta odiosa, by applying, where necessary, dépeçage (see Friedrich K. Juenger, The Problem with Private International Law, Rome 1999, Centro di studi e recerche di diritto comparato e straniero).

International civil law can make an important contribution to overcoming the difficulties involved in cross-border legal disputes, and as a rule, and I am choosing my words very carefully now, international civil law is certainly not inferior to Community law, certainly as far as legal culture and the quality of legal texts are concerned.

The International Court of Justice in The Hague rules on international disputes.

By the end of 2004 at the latest, the European Council will take stock of the situation regarding any outstanding disputes, especially with regard to their implications for the accession process and so as to promote their settlement through the International Court of Justice.