Traducción de «Interrupción del control » (Español → Inglés) :

control break [ control change ]

Priority Intercept Controller [ PIC | priority interrupt controller | priority interrupt module | priority interrupt control unit ]

interrupt handler [ IH | interrupt analyzer | interrupt routine | interrupt control routine | interrupt processing routine | interrupt service routine | interrupt servicing routine ]

interrupt controller

interrupt controller

provide pregnancy termination counselling | provide termination of pregnancy counsel | offer termination of pregnancy counselling | provide termination of pregnancy counselling

offer abortion care | provide pregnancy-termination-care | provide abortion care | provide pregnancy termination care

abortion [ legal abortion | termination of pregnancy | voluntary termination of pregnancy ]

chemicals quality inspector | qc technician chemical manufacturing | chemical manufacturing quality technician | chemical production quality technician

5. The cables connecting the recording equipment to the transmitter must be protected by a continuous plastic-coated rust-protected steel sheath with crimped ends, except where an equivalent protection against manipulation is guaranteed by other means (for example by electronic monitoring such as signal encryption) capable of detecting the presence of any device which is unnecessary for the correct operation of the recording equipment and the purpose of which is to prevent the accurate operation of the recording equipment by short circuiting or interruption or by mod ...[+++]ification of the electronic data from the speed and distance sensor. A joint, comprised of sealed connections, is deemed to be continuous within the meaning of this Regulation.

The Supervisory Authority and the Centre for Security and Safety will indeed be closely linked to the definition of the security procedures that apply: to the system for instance, consultation procedures, procedures for modifying or interrupting signals, or procedures for monitoring users of the governmental service, who will be designated by each Member State according to its needs.

31. Points out that irregularities stem to a considerable degree from complex requirements and regulations; underlines that the number of irregularities in the implementation of cohesion programmes could be reduced through the simplification of management and procedures, early transposition of the newly adopted relevant directives and reinforcement of administrative capacity, notably in the less developed regions; stresses, therefore, the need to minimise the administrative burden for beneficiaries when ensuring the verifications necessary to ensure proper use of ESIF appropriations, as well as the need for efforts to optimise and impr ...[+++]ove the flexibility of management and control systems, place greater focus on risk assessment and correct the allocation of responsibilities among all authorities, while at the same time not undermining established strengthened control procedures, in order to prevent irregularities more effectively and, as a consequence, avoid financial corrections and interruptions in, and suspensions of, payments; is concerned about the low rates of disbursement of financial instruments to beneficiaries, in particular in view of the objective to increase the use of these instruments; asks, in this regard, the Member States, the managing authorities and other relevant stakeholders working with these financial instruments to make full use of the technical assistance provided through the Financial Instruments-Technical Advisory Platform (FI-TAP) and the fi-compass;

31. Points out that irregularities stem to a considerable degree from complex requirements and regulations; underlines that the number of irregularities in the implementation of cohesion programmes could be reduced through the simplification of management and procedures, early transposition of the newly adopted relevant directives and reinforcement of administrative capacity, notably in the less developed regions; stresses, therefore, the need to minimise the administrative burden for beneficiaries when ensuring the verifications necessary to ensure proper use of ESIF appropriations, as well as the need for efforts to optimise and impr ...[+++]ove the flexibility of management and control systems, place greater focus on risk assessment and correct the allocation of responsibilities among all authorities, while at the same time not undermining established strengthened control procedures, in order to prevent irregularities more effectively and, as a consequence, avoid financial corrections and interruptions in, and suspensions of, payments; is concerned about the low rates of disbursement of financial instruments to beneficiaries, in particular in view of the objective to increase the use of these instruments; asks, in this regard, the Member States, the managing authorities and other relevant stakeholders working with these financial instruments to make full use of the technical assistance provided through the Financial Instruments-Technical Advisory Platform (FI-TAP) and the fi-compass;