Traducción de «Junta de evaluación del programa de fusión » (Español → Inglés) :

258. Notes that project stakeholders (ITER organisation and the domestic agencies – including Fusion for Europe) have recognised that the current schedule and budget is not realistic, as confirmed by several independent assessments in the last two years (2013-2014); requests to receive a copy of the revised schedule and budget which will be submitted to the ITER Council in June 2015; is concerned by the regular delays in the ITER programme which questions its efficiency and effectiveness; is deeply concerned by the overcosts, which ...[+++] have impacted upon the cost-effectiveness of the programme and put other Union programmes in jeopardy, mainly in the research policy area;

252. Notes that project stakeholders (ITER organisation and the domestic agencies – including Fusion for Europe) have recognised that the current schedule and budget is not realistic, as confirmed by several independent assessments in the last two years (2013-2014); requests to receive a copy of the revised schedule and budget which will be submitted to the ITER Council in June 2015; is concerned by the regular delays in the ITER programme which questions its efficiency and effectiveness; is deeply concerned by the overcosts, which ...[+++] have impacted upon the cost-effectiveness of the programme and put other Union programmes in jeopardy, mainly in the research policy area;

whereas Article 45(2) of the SRM Regulation provides that the Board should submit an annual report to, inter alia, Parliament, on the performance of the tasks conferred on the Board by that Regulation; whereas that report should in particular cover Board activities as regards resolution planning, assessments of resolvability, determinations of minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities, resolution actions, and the exercise of other duties and powers under the SRM Regulation; whereas that report should also cover detailed information regarding the Single Resolution Fund (the Fund), in particular the evolution of the available fi ...[+++]nancial means of the Fund and any decisions concerning the period for reaching the target level and the calculation of contributions in accordance with Articles 69 to 71 of the SRM Regulation; borrowing, lending and other financial arrangements in accordance with Articles 72 to 74 of the SRM Regulation; the administration and investment strategy of the Fund, in accordance with Article 75 of the SRM Regulation and the applicable Commission delegated acts; the specific conditions of use of the Fund for an individual resolution scheme in accordance with Articles 76 to 78 of the SRM Regulation; the application of the principles of division into national compartments and of progressive merger during the transitional period provided for in Article 3(1)(37) of the SRM Regulation, in accordance with Article 77 of the SRM Regulation, and the use of deposit guarantee schemes in accordance with Article 79 of the SRM Regulation;

2. For legal entities established in Switzerland, the terms and conditions applicable for the submission and evaluation of proposals and those for the granting and conclusion of grant agreements and/or contracts under Programmes covered by this Agreement and under the activities carried out by Fusion for Energy shall be the same as those applicable for grant agreements and/or contracts concluded under the same programmes or activit ...[+++]ies of Fusion for Energy with legal entities established in the Union.

On 11 March the Council on research held a policy debate on the rules for participation and for the dissemination of results, focusing on the minimum number of participants for research actions; the evaluation and selection of proposals; the joint and several liability of participants; complementary financing for EC specific programmes; and the financial contribution to thermonuclear fusion ...[+++] (Euratom).

3. Points out that there is perhaps a danger of overlap between the work of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training and the European Training Foundation; recalls that the work of the European Training Foundation has been financed, to an important degree, through PHARE, TACIS and TEMPUS programmes; calls for the evaluation to assess the existing co-operation between the agencies and to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of a merger between the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training and the European Training Foundation, takes the view, however, that before examining the possible merger of ...[+++]the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training and the European Training Foundation, the Commission must first have at its disposal and study the conclusions and proposals of the external evaluation of both agencies, a procedure which is still underway;